Sensitivity and specificity of subacute computerized neurocognitive testing and symptom evaluation in predicting outcomes after sports-related concussion

Am J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;

39(6):1209-1216.

Lau, B. C., M. W. Collins and M. R. Lovell.

FEE $

Wouldn’t it be nice to earn CME Credits for the research work you’re already doing?

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Concussions affect an estimated 136 000 high school athletes yearly. Computerized neurocognitive testing has been shown to be appropriately sensitive and specific in diagnosing concussions, but no studies have assessed its utility to predict length of recovery. Determining prognosis during subacute recovery after sports concussion will help clinicians more confidently address return-to-play and academic decisions. PURPOSE: To quantify the prognostic ability of computerized neurocognitive testing in combination with symptoms during the subacute recovery phase from sports-related concussion. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: In sum, 108 male high school football athletes completed a computer-based neurocognitive test battery within 2.23 days of injury and were followed until returned to play as set by international guidelines. Athletes were grouped into protracted recovery (>14 days; n = 50) or short-recovery (

Links to full article: